This is why they took all but 3-4% of the cannabinoids out, castrated your gene pool. Why they don’t want mine…

College books explains what light cycle is. Cannabis industry just got caught. So Ed is going to say that college universities all over America are wrong???

Read my friends, go learn…

So Ed is telling me it’s OK to veg indoors for 18-24 hours a day even tho the sun outdoors is 16 because he put a plant in the greenhouse in August and the sun was soo intense that your LED can’t get that bright so it’s OK…. Are you serious???

Folks I do 12/1-11 veg 12/1-11 clones and 10-8/14-16 Budding depending on strains… My plants look and grow just fine….. Especially since I don’t veg at all most of the time.

This book below used in universities nationwide backs up exactly what I say… Question you should be asking is, how come no one in the cannabis industry say this???? Except me…

Below is a joke

Looks as if your corrupt narrative is falling apart…. Imagine that.. You keep scurrying like roaches, I’ll keep pointing out your corruption…

Light Cycles in Peter Nelson’s Greenhouse Book

You

Explain the light cycles in the book greenhouse operation and management by peter Nelson

Grok

Worked for 21s

In Paul V. Nelson’s Greenhouse Operation and Management (commonly the 6th or 7th edition; the author is Paul V. Nelson, not Peter), light cycles are covered primarily in Chapter 11 (“Light and Temperature”). The discussion centers on photoperiod (daylength/night length) for controlling flowering and development, along with light intensity, quality, and Daily Light Integral (DLI).⁠Pearson

Photoperiod Basics

Plants respond primarily to the length of the uninterrupted dark period (night), not the day. The key concept is the critical night length—the duration of darkness below which a short-night (long-day) plant responds, or above which a long-night (short-day) plant responds. This critical length varies by species and sometimes by cultivar.⁠Vdoc

Plants are grouped into photoperiodic categories:

• Short-day plants (also called long-night plants) — Flower (or flower more readily) when nights exceed the critical length.
• Long-day plants (also called short-night plants) — Flower (or flower more readily) when nights are shorter than the critical length.
• Day-neutral plants — Little or no flowering response to day/night length.
• Some plants are facultative (response is accelerated but not strictly required) or require specific sequences of daylengths (e.g., dual day-length plants).

The book includes an extensive tabulated list of crops with their photoperiodic response groups.⁠Pearson

Methods of Photoperiodic Control (“Light Cycles”)

Growers manipulate the light/dark cycle artificially:

Creating artificial long days (short nights) — Used to promote flowering in long-day plants or keep short-day plants vegetative:

• Day-extension lighting — Supplemental low-intensity light added at the end of the natural day (or sometimes before dawn) to lengthen the perceived day.
• Night-interruption (NI) lighting — Low-intensity light applied in the middle of the night (commonly ~10 p.m. to 2 a.m., for about 4 hours total) to break the long dark period into two shorter ones. This is highly effective.
• Cyclic (intermittent) lighting — An energy-saving alternative to continuous night interruption. The usual continuous lighting period is broken into multiple short light + dark cycles. Light duration can be reduced by as much as 80%. Example given in the book: where 3 hours of continuous light would normally be used, six consecutive cycles of 5 minutes light + 25 minutes darkness can substitute, greatly cutting electricity use.⁠Vdoc

Typical minimum intensity for photoperiodic (not photosynthetic) lighting is low—around 10 foot-candles (~2 µmol·m⁻²·s⁻¹) at plant level.

Creating artificial short days (long nights) — Used to promote flowering in short-day plants:

• Opaque black cloth or blackout curtains are pulled over the crop (usually from late afternoon until the next morning) to exclude natural light and create the required long dark period. Light leaks must be avoided.

Related Light Topics in the Same Chapter

• Daily Light Integral (DLI) — Total photosynthetically active radiation received in a day (mol·m⁻²·d⁻¹). Crops are categorized by DLI requirements; this drives growth rate more than instantaneous intensity alone. Supplemental lighting schedules are planned to meet target DLI when natural light is insufficient.⁠Pearson
• Light quality (wavelengths) affects both photosynthesis and developmental responses via photoreceptors (phytochrome, etc.).
• Interactions with temperature (including DIF—the day–night temperature difference) are also discussed for height and flowering control.

My friend skunk weed is right here in the Ozarks

Here’s a snapshot… A strain we stress tested in every way.

1. Grown in two gallon pot
2. Had to survive heat of summer with little water
3. Was given as little of nutrients possible
4. This was day of harvest

Don’t get your panties in a wad just yet. This isn’t for everyone, but you know who.. Just started.. Have hundreds of cultivars to go… Skunks for the win.. This tent warrior will slaughter all…

Thinking about creating a book or video if all the screen shots of the chat logs that was saved during my online stay, see I saved every chat… Every person who hated and disrespected me… Would be a top seller as sales would be high just cause you would want to see if you’re there….. Would show the world the true you…. Oh my this would be fun.

You actually think I’m going to sit here and let you disrespect me with your corrupt garbage….

This video says the cannabis industry has failed due to everyone having the same products….

Well….. I fixed this problem….. Now what’s your excuse.

This here is my last post, not much more too say at this point. It seems you don’t care, so I’m not waisting my time. Here’s my podcast I did years ago.

This is what is completely wrong in the cannabis industry. Very sad to actually see this…. This is exactly why Cannabinoid Hyperemesis exists. What do you do when the industry normalizes this… Completely ruining the gene pool for ever. Can’t fix years of this

Why fem breeding narrows the cannabis gene pool

Breeding two female plants (via forced hermaphroditism / “fem” methods) is not true outcrossing sexual breeding; it is a form of inbreeding or clonal-line propagation that progressively narrows genetic diversity.

What actual breeding requires

Sexual reproduction in dioecious plants (separate male and female individuals, as in many cannabis lines) normally involves:

• A male plant contributing pollen that carries a Y chromosome (or the equivalent sex-determining factors).
• A female plant receiving that pollen.
• The resulting seeds combining half the genome from each parent. This continually reshuffles alleles, maintains heterozygosity, and allows selection against deleterious recessives while preserving useful variation.

That process is what maintains a healthy, adaptable gene pool over generations.

What “fem breeding” actually does

Feminized seed production typically works by stressing or chemically treating a female plant (colloidal silver, STS, environmental stress, etc.) so it produces male flowers and pollen. That pollen is then used on another female (or the same plant). Because both parents are genetically female (XX), the pollen carries only X-bearing gametes. Nearly all offspring are female.

Genetically this is equivalent to:

• Crossing two closely related females, or
• Self-pollination / sib-mating within a female line.

It is not the introduction of new, independent male genomes. It is recycling the same maternal genetic background.

Why this degrades the gene pool

Repeated fem-only cycles produce the classic effects of inbreeding:

• Loss of heterozygosity. Heterozygous loci become homozygous. Any recessive deleterious alleles that were previously masked are now expressed. Over successive generations this appears as inbreeding depression: reduced vigor, lower yields, increased hermaphroditism, weaker stress tolerance, smaller plants, etc.
• Narrowed genetic base. Alleles present only in true males (or in unrelated male lines) are never introduced. Useful variation for disease resistance, cannabinoid/terpene diversity, environmental adaptation, and overall robustness is lost.
• Accumulation of fixed defects. Once a harmful allele becomes homozygous and fixed in a line, it is extremely difficult to remove without outcrossing to unrelated material (preferably involving males).
• Increased hermaphroditism risk. The very tendency to produce male flowers under stress is heritable. Selecting and propagating plants that readily herm under the treatments used to make fem pollen concentrates that trait. Later generations become more unstable.

In short, continuous fem-only production is closer to vegetative cloning with an occasional meiotic shuffle of the same limited gene set than it is to population-level breeding. It can produce uniform, female-heavy seed for commercial convenience, but it does so by sacrificing the genetic health that true male × female crosses maintain.

Responsible long-term breeding programs therefore retain true males, periodically outcross to unrelated lines, and use feminization selectively and sparingly rather than as the sole method.

Then they pass it to the next breeder who does exactly the same, over and over and over… Nah, you have awesome genetics my friend. Look at the comments in this video to actually see how gone the cannabis industry is. Never coming back without a new Gene pool.

This is exactly why I did my breeding program, someone had to save the actual cannabis gene pool.

If you live in Missouri this is for you

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, State, ZIP Code]
[Email Address]
[Phone Number]

October 15, 2026

Members of the Missouri General Assembly
Missouri State Capitol
201 West Capitol Avenue
Jefferson City, MO 65101

Re: Supporting Landrace and Old-School Cannabis Genetics to Strengthen Missouri’s Cannabis Industry and Economic Position

Dear Honorable Members of the Missouri General Assembly:

I write to urge your attention to a critical opportunity in Missouri’s cannabis industry: the preservation, cultivation, and commercialization of authentic landrace and old-school genetics. These foundational genetics—true regional varieties developed over generations and classic lines from the 1960s–1980s—are in high demand among cultivators, breeders, and consumers nationwide. Missouri is uniquely positioned to lead in this area, and companies such as Wayback Weed LLC already hold genetics that could give our state a decisive competitive edge.

Missouri’s regulated cannabis market has matured into a substantial economic engine. With hundreds of licensed dispensaries, significant annual sales, ongoing microbusiness licensing, and a framework that has largely captured legal demand, the industry contributes meaningfully to tax revenue, jobs, and local economies. Yet as the market stabilizes, product differentiation becomes essential. Much of today’s commercial cannabis traces back to a narrow set of modern hybrid families. This genetic bottleneck has produced consistency but also sameness—similar flavors, effects, vulnerabilities and Cannabinoid Hyperemesis. Growers and consumers increasingly seek the unique terpene profiles, resilience traits, minor cannabinoids, and authentic character found in landrace and heirloom genetics.

Demand for these genetics is clear and growing. Breeders value landraces for the genetic diversity they reintroduce—traits for disease resistance, environmental adaptation, novel aromas, and hybrid vigor that modern inbred lines have lost. Consumers are shifting toward nuanced, distinctive experiences rather than solely high-THC novelty. Preservation efforts and specialty breeding programs are responding to this interest because pure landrace and carefully maintained old-school lines are becoming rare. Missouri can meet this demand by supporting the expansion and commercialization of such genetics within our in-state cultivation system.

Wayback Weed LLC, based in the Missouri Ozarks, has already assembled and preserved a curated library of clean, diverse, old-school and landrace-derived genetics. These lines represent foundational material largely unavailable elsewhere in commercial volume. Integrating and scaling these genetics across Missouri’s licensed cultivators would create products and seed stock that other states cannot easily replicate. This exclusivity would drive premium pricing, attract out-of-state buyers seeking authentic genetics, support specialized breeding and research activity, and generate additional tax revenue and high-skill employment in rural areas such as the Ozarks.

The financial benefits to Missouri are direct. Unique, high-demand genetics increase the value of Missouri-grown flower and seeds, strengthen the state’s position as a genetics hub, encourage capital investment in breeding and cultivation facilities, and help retain more of the cannabis supply chain within our borders. In a competitive multi-state market, differentiation through authentic genetics is a durable advantage—one that supports long-term industry health rather than short-term volume competition.

I respectfully request that the General Assembly and the Division of Cannabis Regulation examine policies that facilitate the responsible expansion of landrace and old-school genetics programs. This could include clarifying pathways for genetics acquisition and documentation, supporting research and preservation initiatives, and ensuring regulatory frameworks encourage rather than hinder the commercialization of unique Missouri-based genetic resources such as those maintained by Wayback Weed LLC.

Missouri already has the climate, the legal framework, the industry infrastructure, and—critically—access to rare genetics that few other states possess. Embracing landrace and old-school genetics will not only meet clear market demand but will position Missouri as a leader in the next phase of the cannabis industry. I urge you to act on this opportunity for the benefit of Missouri’s economy, its cannabis sector, and the communities it supports.

Thank you for your consideration of this important matter. I am available to provide additional information or meet with staff to discuss these points further.

Respectfully submitted,

[YOUR NAME[